This is the mail archive of the
gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the GCC project.
[Bug fortran/67171] [6 regression] sourced allocation
- From: "vehre at gmx dot de" <gcc-bugzilla at gcc dot gnu dot org>
- To: gcc-bugs at gcc dot gnu dot org
- Date: Tue, 20 Oct 2015 14:23:21 +0000
- Subject: [Bug fortran/67171] [6 regression] sourced allocation
- Auto-submitted: auto-generated
- References: <bug-67171-4 at http dot gcc dot gnu dot org/bugzilla/>
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67171
--- Comment #4 from Andre Vehreschild <vehre at gmx dot de> ---
Hi Paul,
please compare:
https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/fortran/2015-10/msg00033.html
to your fix. Sounds like we are doing the same.
- Andre
On Tue, 20 Oct 2015 14:13:55 +0000
"pault at gcc dot gnu.org" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org> wrote:
> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67171
>
> Paul Thomas <pault at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:
>
> What |Removed |Added
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------------
> Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |pault at gcc dot gnu.org
>
> --- Comment #3 from Paul Thomas <pault at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
> The bug arises because array sections are marked as DECL_ARTIFICIAL and so the
> offending SOURCE expression produces a temporary variable, whose offset is out
> of kilter, being zero. The most economical solution, in terms of effort, is
> simply to suppress the creation of the temporary, when the source is a
> variable. This is regtesting right now. Alternatively, the array descriptor
> could be converted to unity based indexes, with the appropriate offset.
>
> I'll take it.
>
> Paul
>