This is the mail archive of the
gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the GCC project.
[Bug c++/67773] destructor called on temp object before and named object after move, while not being called on named object before move
- From: "awenocur at aol dot com" <gcc-bugzilla at gcc dot gnu dot org>
- To: gcc-bugs at gcc dot gnu dot org
- Date: Wed, 30 Sep 2015 12:00:33 +0000
- Subject: [Bug c++/67773] destructor called on temp object before and named object after move, while not being called on named object before move
- Auto-submitted: auto-generated
- References: <bug-67773-4 at http dot gcc dot gnu dot org/bugzilla/>
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67773
--- Comment #6 from Adam Wenocur <awenocur at aol dot com> ---
Whoops! Sorry about the malformed double-post.
Another way of explaining the problem is that the compiler appears to be
suppressing the wrong destructor call. Since this is a move and not a copy, or
in C++03 it's a copy elision, it should be suppressing the destructor call on
the temporary variable. It's not doing this though; it's suppressing the first
destructor call on the named variable instead.
When I get a chance, I'll build a GCC for testing purposes. What version would
be appropriate in this case? Is 4.8.5 supported?