This is the mail archive of the
gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the GCC project.
[Bug c/67730] New: [5.2 Regression] No warning when returning NULL in void function
- From: "damwdan at gmail dot com" <gcc-bugzilla at gcc dot gnu dot org>
- To: gcc-bugs at gcc dot gnu dot org
- Date: Sun, 27 Sep 2015 11:19:37 +0000
- Subject: [Bug c/67730] New: [5.2 Regression] No warning when returning NULL in void function
- Auto-submitted: auto-generated
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67730
Bug ID: 67730
Summary: [5.2 Regression] No warning when returning NULL in
void function
Product: gcc
Version: 5.2.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: major
Priority: P3
Component: c
Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
Reporter: damwdan at gmail dot com
Target Milestone: ---
Created attachment 36401
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=36401&action=edit
preprocessed source file
Following up on this Stackoverflow post:
http://stackoverflow.com/q/32732281/5366270
There seems to be a regression in gcc 5.2.0. When returning NULL in a void
function, gcc *does not* warn or error. gcc 4.9.2 (and some other previous
versions, as mentioned in the post) warns. clang 3.7 errors. As noted by "Marc
Glisse", using -Wsystem-headers does the trick and generates a warning. Though,
the preprocessed output (attached) is exactly the same.
$ cat c.c
#include <stddef.h>
void procedure(void)
{
return NULL;
}
$ gcc -Wall -Wextra -std=c99 -pedantic -c c.c
$ gcc -Wall -Wextra -std=c99 -pedantic -Wsystem-headers -c c.c
In file included from c.c:1:0:
c.c: In function âprocedureâ:
c.c:5:12: warning: âreturnâ with a value, in function returning void
return NULL;
^
$ gcc -v
Using built-in specs.
COLLECT_GCC=gcc
COLLECT_LTO_WRAPPER=/usr/lib/gcc/x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu/5.2.0/lto-wrapper
Target: x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu
Configured with: /build/gcc-multilib/src/gcc-5.2.0/configure --prefix=/usr
--libdir=/usr/lib --libexecdir=/usr/lib --mandir=/usr/share/man
--infodir=/usr/share/info --with-bugurl=https://bugs.archlinux.org/
--enable-languages=c,c++,ada,fortran,go,lto,objc,obj-c++ --enable-shared
--enable-threads=posix --enable-libmpx --with-system-zlib --with-isl
--enable-__cxa_atexit --disable-libunwind-exceptions --enable-clocale=gnu
--disable-libstdcxx-pch --disable-libssp --enable-gnu-unique-object
--enable-linker-build-id --enable-lto --enable-plugin
--enable-install-libiberty --with-linker-hash-style=gnu
--enable-gnu-indirect-function --enable-multilib --disable-werror
--enable-checking=release --with-default-libstdcxx-abi=gcc4-compatible
Thread model: posix
gcc version 5.2.0 (GCC)
Note that the bug also appears when returning NULL in an int or char function,
but not double (an error is generated).