This is the mail archive of the
gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the GCC project.
[Bug c++/67632] New: explicit instantiation omits copy constructor and others
- From: "jlink at drw dot com" <gcc-bugzilla at gcc dot gnu dot org>
- To: gcc-bugs at gcc dot gnu dot org
- Date: Fri, 18 Sep 2015 20:54:50 +0000
- Subject: [Bug c++/67632] New: explicit instantiation omits copy constructor and others
- Auto-submitted: auto-generated
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67632
Bug ID: 67632
Summary: explicit instantiation omits copy constructor and
others
Product: gcc
Version: 4.9.2
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: c++
Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
Reporter: jlink at drw dot com
Target Milestone: ---
When I compile the follow test case with g++ -std=c++11 -c, and view the output
with nm, it shows that the std::unordered_map copy constructor is never
emitted:
% cat t.cc
#include <unordered_map>
template class std::unordered_map<int, int>;
% g++ -std=c++11 -c t.cc
%
If I compile the following and link it with the above, I'll get the undefined
reference:
% cat x.cc
#include <unordered_map>
extern template class std::unordered_map<int, int>;
std::unordered_map<int, int> copy(
const std::unordered_map<int, int> & a) { return a; }
main() {}
% g++ -std=c++11 t.o x.cc
/tmp/cc0dF94P.o: In function `copy(std::unordered_map<int, int, std::hash<int>,
std::equal_to<int>, std::allocator<std::pair<int const, int> > > const&)':
x.cc:(.text+0x1f): undefined reference to `std::unordered_map<int, int,
std::hash<int>, std::equal_to<int>, std::allocator<std::pair<int const, int> >
>::unordered_map(std::unordered_map<int, int, std::hash<int>,
std::equal_to<int>, std::allocator<std::pair<int const, int> > > const&)'
collect2: error: ld returned 1 exit status
This seems like a clear bug, right? Either the explicit instantiation should
emit everything, or the use of extern template should know what still needs to
be emitted locally.