This is the mail archive of the gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format: [Raw text]

[Bug c++/67342] Ill-formed move constructor ignored in favor of copy constructor


https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67342

Jonathan Wakely <redi at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
             Status|UNCONFIRMED                 |RESOLVED
         Resolution|---                         |INVALID

--- Comment #1 from Jonathan Wakely <redi at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
The compiler is correct, see [class.copy]/11.

B(B&&) is defaulted, so is defined as deleted, and "A defaulted move
constructor that is defined as deleted is ignored by overload resolution"


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]