This is the mail archive of the
gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the GCC project.
[Bug tree-optimization/66726] New: missed optimization, factor conversion out of COND_EXPR
- From: "law at redhat dot com" <gcc-bugzilla at gcc dot gnu dot org>
- To: gcc-bugs at gcc dot gnu dot org
- Date: Wed, 01 Jul 2015 17:23:06 +0000
- Subject: [Bug tree-optimization/66726] New: missed optimization, factor conversion out of COND_EXPR
- Auto-submitted: auto-generated
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66726
Bug ID: 66726
Summary: missed optimization, factor conversion out of
COND_EXPR
Product: gcc
Version: unknown
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: tree-optimization
Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
Reporter: law at redhat dot com
Target Milestone: ---
Given something like this:
n = (short unsigned int) mode_size[(unsigned int) mode] * 8 <= 64 ? (int)
((short unsigned int) mode_size[(unsigned int) mode] * 8) : 64;
Note the (int) cast on the true arm of the COND_EXPR. As a result of that
cast, the transformations to turn a COND_EXPR into a MIN/MAX expression in
fold-const.c will not trigger.
This could be fixed by a patch to match.pd, but the pattern would only really
be applicable to GENERIC and thus isn't considered a good design match for
match.pd.
We could extend fold-const.c to catch this case, but that would really only
help GENERIC as well.
The best option it seems would be to catch this in phi-opt which would also
take us a step closer to handling pr45397.
Testcase:
/* { dg-do compile } */
/* { dg-options "-O2 -fdump-tree-original" } */
extern unsigned short mode_size[];
int
oof (int mode)
{
return (64 < mode_size[mode] ? 64 : mode_size[mode]);
}
/* { dg-final { scan-tree-dump-times "MIN_EXPR" 1 "original" } } */
- Follow-Ups:
- [Bug tree-optimization/66726] missed optimization, factor conversion out of COND_EXPR
- From: kugan at gcc dot gnu.org
- [Bug tree-optimization/66726] missed optimization, factor conversion out of COND_EXPR
- From: pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org
- [Bug tree-optimization/66726] missed optimization, factor conversion out of COND_EXPR
- From: kugan at gcc dot gnu.org
- [Bug tree-optimization/66726] missed optimization, factor conversion out of COND_EXPR
- From: pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org
- [Bug tree-optimization/66726] missed optimization, factor conversion out of COND_EXPR
- From: kugan at gcc dot gnu.org
- [Bug tree-optimization/66726] missed optimization, factor conversion out of COND_EXPR
- From: law at redhat dot com
- [Bug tree-optimization/66726] missed optimization, factor conversion out of COND_EXPR
- From: law at redhat dot com
- [Bug tree-optimization/66726] missed optimization, factor conversion out of COND_EXPR
- From: kugan at gcc dot gnu.org
- [Bug tree-optimization/66726] missed optimization, factor conversion out of COND_EXPR
- From: schwab at linux-m68k dot org
- [Bug tree-optimization/66726] missed optimization, factor conversion out of COND_EXPR
- From: law at redhat dot com
- [Bug tree-optimization/66726] missed optimization, factor conversion out of COND_EXPR
- From: kugan at gcc dot gnu.org
- [Bug tree-optimization/66726] missed optimization, factor conversion out of COND_EXPR
- From: kugan at gcc dot gnu.org