This is the mail archive of the
gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the GCC project.
[Bug c++/66701] __cxxabiv1::__cxa_pure_virtual - can it take an argument of the pointer to the function that was called, please?
- From: "jmcguiness at liquidcapital dot com" <gcc-bugzilla at gcc dot gnu dot org>
- To: gcc-bugs at gcc dot gnu dot org
- Date: Wed, 01 Jul 2015 08:06:38 +0000
- Subject: [Bug c++/66701] __cxxabiv1::__cxa_pure_virtual - can it take an argument of the pointer to the function that was called, please?
- Auto-submitted: auto-generated
- References: <bug-66701-4 at http dot gcc dot gnu dot org/bugzilla/>
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66701
Jason McG <jmcguiness at liquidcapital dot com> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Status|RESOLVED |CLOSED
Resolution|INVALID |WONTFIX
--- Comment #4 from Jason McG <jmcguiness at liquidcapital dot com> ---
Once the existence of the restricted ABI was pointed out to me I did not
propose to change it. I proposed creating a new version of the ABI that would
have an improved signature. That signature would be dependent upon what the
compiler could emit. It is not unreasonable to assume that there is an
interplay between what the compiler can emit which should drive the
specification of the ABI.
I have edited the status to "closed/wontfix" as clearly there is no inclination
to implement this enhancement.