This is the mail archive of the
gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the GCC project.
[Bug c++/57709] -Wshadow is too strict / has false positives
- From: "gael.guennebaud at gmail dot com" <gcc-bugzilla at gcc dot gnu dot org>
- To: gcc-bugs at gcc dot gnu dot org
- Date: Tue, 09 Jun 2015 09:33:49 +0000
- Subject: [Bug c++/57709] -Wshadow is too strict / has false positives
- Auto-submitted: auto-generated
- References: <bug-57709-4 at http dot gcc dot gnu dot org/bugzilla/>
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57709
Gael Guennebaud <gael.guennebaud at gmail dot com> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
CC| |gael.guennebaud at gmail dot com
--- Comment #15 from Gael Guennebaud <gael.guennebaud at gmail dot com> ---
-Wshadow still trigger false positive when a base member functions is imported
with the "using" keyword, as in the following example (tested with gcc 5.1):
template<typename T> struct BaseClass {
BaseClass(int size) : m_size(size) {}
int size() { return m_size; }
int m_size;
};
template<typename T> struct Foo : BaseClass<T> {
typedef BaseClass<T> Base;
Foo(int size) : Base(size) {}
using Base::size;
};
$ g++-mp-5 gcc_shadow.cpp -c -Wshadow
gcc_shadow.cpp: In constructor 'Foo<T>::Foo(int)':
gcc_shadow.cpp:9:17: warning: declaration of 'size' shadows a member of
'Foo<T>' [-Wshadow]
Foo(int size) : Base(size) {}
^
gcc_shadow.cpp:10:15: note: shadowed declaration is here
using Base::size;
Note that clang does not warn in this case, so it should be possible to figure
out that in this case, the imported "size" symbol is a function and not a
variable.