This is the mail archive of the
gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the GCC project.
[Bug c/66066] [6 Regression] r222889 causes bogus error: initializer element is not constant
- From: "joseph at codesourcery dot com" <gcc-bugzilla at gcc dot gnu dot org>
- To: gcc-bugs at gcc dot gnu dot org
- Date: Tue, 12 May 2015 16:18:47 +0000
- Subject: [Bug c/66066] [6 Regression] r222889 causes bogus error: initializer element is not constant
- Auto-submitted: auto-generated
- References: <bug-66066-4 at http dot gcc dot gnu dot org/bugzilla/>
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66066
--- Comment #12 from joseph at codesourcery dot com <joseph at codesourcery dot com> ---
On Tue, 12 May 2015, manu at gcc dot gnu.org wrote:
> > Working on this, but it isn't a simple matter of adding "pedantic".
>
> Joseph, would testing global_dc->pedantic_errors be an acceptable work-around
> (with a big ??? note) while a better solution is found?
If you want a workaround, a test for "pedantic" would be the natural
workaround, but I think the proper fix is folding as I described at
<https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2015-05/msg01015.html> to allow these
cases to reach the existing pedwarn-if-pedantic logic.