This is the mail archive of the
gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the GCC project.
[Bug libstdc++/66006] New: [6 regression] abi_check FAILs
- From: "ro at gcc dot gnu.org" <gcc-bugzilla at gcc dot gnu dot org>
- To: gcc-bugs at gcc dot gnu dot org
- Date: Mon, 04 May 2015 14:10:42 +0000
- Subject: [Bug libstdc++/66006] New: [6 regression] abi_check FAILs
- Auto-submitted: auto-generated
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66006
Bug ID: 66006
Summary: [6 regression] abi_check FAILs
Product: gcc
Version: 6.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: libstdc++
Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
Reporter: ro at gcc dot gnu.org
CC: redi at gcc dot gnu.org
Target Milestone: ---
Host: *-*-solaris2.*
Target: *-*-solaris2.*
Build: *-*-solaris2.*
Within the last few days, the libstdc++-v3 abi_check started to FAIL on
Solaris:
libstdc++.log has
2 incompatible symbols
0
_ZNSt7__cxx1115basic_stringbufIwSt11char_traitsIwESaIwEED2Ev
std::__cxx11::basic_stringbuf<wchar_t, std::char_traits<wchar_t>,
std::allocator<wchar_t> >::~basic_stringbuf()
version status: incompatible
GLIBCXX_3.4.21
type: function
status: added
1
_ZNSt7__cxx1115basic_stringbufIcSt11char_traitsIcESaIcEED2Ev
std::__cxx11::basic_stringbuf<char, std::char_traits<char>,
std::allocator<char> >::~basic_stringbuf()
version status: incompatible
GLIBCXX_3.4.21
type: function
status: added
I have no idea what's going on here: those symbols are in the gcc 5
libstdc++.so
already, no idea why they are considered incompatible.
Rainer