This is the mail archive of the
gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the GCC project.
[Bug ipa/65478] [5 regression] crafty performance regression
- From: "glisse at gcc dot gnu.org" <gcc-bugzilla at gcc dot gnu dot org>
- To: gcc-bugs at gcc dot gnu dot org
- Date: Mon, 30 Mar 2015 18:25:51 +0000
- Subject: [Bug ipa/65478] [5 regression] crafty performance regression
- Auto-submitted: auto-generated
- References: <bug-65478-4 at http dot gcc dot gnu dot org/bugzilla/>
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65478
--- Comment #18 from Marc Glisse <glisse at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
(In reply to Richard Biener from comment #16)
> But yes, in principle we can do sth fancy for union loads, though I'd
> use BIT_FIELD_REFs (hoping no issues wrt endian...) as the canonical
> and "easy" way to represent things here.
Just adding a link to PR 28367.