This is the mail archive of the
gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the GCC project.
[Bug ipa/65478] [5 regression] crafty performance regression
- From: "jamborm at gcc dot gnu.org" <gcc-bugzilla at gcc dot gnu dot org>
- To: gcc-bugs at gcc dot gnu dot org
- Date: Tue, 24 Mar 2015 17:47:49 +0000
- Subject: [Bug ipa/65478] [5 regression] crafty performance regression
- Auto-submitted: auto-generated
- References: <bug-65478-4 at http dot gcc dot gnu dot org/bugzilla/>
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65478
--- Comment #8 from Martin Jambor <jamborm at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
Created attachment 35127
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=35127&action=edit
Inlining decisions difference
(In reply to Martin Jambor from comment #6)
> This suggests that cloning of function Search and not inlining
> NextMove is only part of the story.
>
I'm attaching output of my script that compares inlining decisions.
"File 1" is wpa inlining dump file generated by r219862, "File 2" is
wpa inlining dump generated by r219863 on source where Search was
annotated as noclone.
(In reply to Jan Hubicka from comment #7)
> Yep, that sounds like resonable thing to try to me.
>
OK, I'll prepare a patch for this part.