This is the mail archive of the gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format: [Raw text]

[Bug libgomp/64972] [5 Regression] Build failure in libgomp for i686-w64-mingw32 target after latest merge from gomp-4_0-branch


https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64972

--- Comment #6 from Jakub Jelinek <jakub at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
(In reply to Rainer Emrich from comment #5)
> (In reply to Jakub Jelinek from comment #4)
> > And the suggested fix is just to cast to unsigned long and use %ld or %lx
> > instead of %zd and %zx.  I can't test it on these targets, so it is better
> > if somebody with M$ access writes and tests the patch.
> 
> Index: target.c
> ===================================================================
> --- target.c    (Revision 221607)
> +++ target.c    (Arbeitskopie)
> @@ -439,8 +439,8 @@ gomp_map_vars (struct gomp_device_descr
>                          was missing.  */
>                       size_t size = k->host_end - k->host_start;
>                       gomp_fatal ("present clause: !acc_is_present (%p, "
> -                                 "%zd (0x%zx))", (void *) k->host_start,
> -                                 size, size);
> +                                 "%ld (0x%lx))", (void *) k->host_start,
> +                                 (unsigned long) size, (unsigned long)
> size);
>                     }
>                     break;
>                   case GOMP_MAP_FORCE_DEVICEPTR:
> 
> Something like this? At least that builds on x86_64-w64-mingw32.

Yeah.

> But there is another issue with formatters in oacc-parallel.c.
> Shall I append to this bug or open a new one?

Please don't create a new bug, it is the same thing.


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]