This is the mail archive of the
gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the GCC project.
[Bug middle-end/34010] [4.8/4.9/5 Regression] ppc64 bad stdargs codegen for zero sized objects
- From: "aldyh at gcc dot gnu.org" <gcc-bugzilla at gcc dot gnu dot org>
- To: gcc-bugs at gcc dot gnu dot org
- Date: Wed, 18 Mar 2015 00:06:49 +0000
- Subject: [Bug middle-end/34010] [4.8/4.9/5 Regression] ppc64 bad stdargs codegen for zero sized objects
- Auto-submitted: auto-generated
- References: <bug-34010-4 at http dot gcc dot gnu dot org/bugzilla/>
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=34010
Aldy Hernandez <aldyh at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
CC| |segher at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #10 from Aldy Hernandez <aldyh at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
Segher, the only struct-layout-1.c failure I see that is related to PPC on the
GCC test results list is yours for "-m32 -mpowerpc64" running on ppc64. This
is 32-bit powerpc but with the ppc64 instruction set, is it not?
Did this test ever work?
FAIL: tmpdir-gcc.dg-struct-layout-1/t002 c_compat_x_tst.o-c_compat_y_tst.o link
...from: https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-testresults/2015-03/msg01870.html
That is, is it legitimately a regression?