This is the mail archive of the gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format: [Raw text]

[Bug rtl-optimization/65379] New: ifcvt does not clean up dead instructions


https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65379

            Bug ID: 65379
           Summary: ifcvt does not clean up dead instructions
           Product: gcc
           Version: 5.0
            Status: UNCONFIRMED
          Severity: normal
          Priority: P3
         Component: rtl-optimization
          Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
          Reporter: krebbel at gcc dot gnu.org

Created attachment 35002
  --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=35002&action=edit
Experimental and way too expensive fix

the combine pass sometimes gets confused by already dead compares
which are remains of the if conversion pass.  This e.g. happens in
gcc.dg/builtin-bswap-7.c.  Compiling with -march=z196 the if blocks
are modified to make use of load on condition. This duplicates the
compare insn but unfortunately ifcvt fails to clean it up and the
additional compare survives until the second ifcvt pass. Combine fails
to do the simplification of the bswap since the bswapped value appears
to be used in the second compare as well.

ifcvt runs df_analyze in a loop until nothing changes anymore. So this
loop is always left with all df solutions being clean. However, dce is
only run once, before the first iteration.

ce1:

(insn 2 4 3 2 (set (reg/v:DI 64 [ a ])
        (reg:DI 2 %r2 [ a ]))
/home3/andreas/gcc/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/builtin-bswap-7.c:15 863 {*movdi_64}
     (expr_list:REG_DEAD (reg:DI 2 %r2 [ a ])
        (nil)))
(note 3 2 6 2 NOTE_INSN_FUNCTION_BEG)
(insn 6 3 7 2 (set (reg:DI 60 [ D.2056 ])
        (bswap:DI (reg/v:DI 64 [ a ])))
/home3/andreas/gcc/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/builtin-bswap-7.c:16 1501 {bswapdi2}
     (expr_list:REG_DEAD (reg/v:DI 64 [ a ])
        (nil)))
(insn 7 6 8 2 (set (reg:SI 66 [ D.2057+-3 ])
        (const_int 1 [0x1])) 867 {*movsi_zarch}
     (nil))
(insn 8 7 22 2 (set (reg:CCZ 33 %cc)
        (compare:CCZ (reg:DI 60 [ D.2056 ])
            (const_int 42949672960 [0xa00000000]))) 822 {*cmpdi_cct}
     (expr_list:REG_DEAD (reg:DI 60 [ D.2056 ])
        (nil)))
(insn 22 8 23 2 (set (reg:SI 70)
        (const_int 1 [0x1])) 867 {*movsi_zarch}
     (nil))
(insn 23 22 24 2 (set (reg:SI 71)
        (const_int 0 [0])) 867 {*movsi_zarch}
     (nil))
(insn 24 23 25 2 (set (reg:CCZ 33 %cc)
        (compare:CCZ (reg:DI 60 [ D.2056 ])
            (const_int 42949672960 [0xa00000000]))) 822 {*cmpdi_cct}
     (nil))
(insn 25 24 12 2 (set (reg:SI 66 [ D.2057+-3 ])
        (if_then_else:SI (eq (reg:CCZ 33 %cc)
                (const_int 0 [0]))
            (reg:SI 70)
            (reg:SI 71))) 1234 {*movsicc}


Hence combine must assume that r60 is still needed for insn 24 although this
insn should have been removed already. Combine tries to match the following
insn what fails:
(parallel [
        (set (reg:CCZ 33 %cc)
            (compare:CCZ (bswap:DI (reg:DI 2 %r2 [ a ]))
                (const_int 42949672960 [0xa00000000])))
        (set (reg:DI 60 [ D.2056 ])
            (bswap:DI (reg:DI 2 %r2 [ a ])))
    ])


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]