This is the mail archive of the gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format: [Raw text]

[Bug middle-end/64809] [5 Regression] ICE at -O3 with -g enabled on x86_64-linux-gnu (in 32-bit mode)


https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64809

--- Comment #5 from Jakub Jelinek <jakub at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
Created attachment 34590
  --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=34590&action=edit
gcc5-pr64809.patch

IMHO in any case we should apply something like the attached patch, there is no
point to even look at the debug stmts and TER really shouldn't make any
guarantees for uses in debug stmts, those must be by definition ignored for TER
purposes.  Whether that is sufficient is another question.


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]