This is the mail archive of the gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format: [Raw text]

[Bug middle-end/64614] bogus used initialized warning (in gcc 4.9.2 not in 4.8.3); switch statement versus &


https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64614

--- Comment #2 from Dr. David Alan Gilbert <dgilbert at redhat dot com> ---
(In reply to Marek Polacek from comment #1)
> We have tons of these -W*uninitialized bugs, so there's likely a dup.

Yep, it's possible - I couldn't find an obvious match; but two things to note
that might make this case easier to track down:
   a) It seems a regression from 4.8.3 to 4.9.2
   b) To me it seems specific to the  if/switch combination

Dave


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]