This is the mail archive of the
gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the GCC project.
[Bug rtl-optimization/64110] [5 Regression] ICE: Max. number of generated reload insns per insn is achieved (90)
- From: "jakub at gcc dot gnu.org" <gcc-bugzilla at gcc dot gnu dot org>
- To: gcc-bugs at gcc dot gnu dot org
- Date: Fri, 09 Jan 2015 16:36:09 +0000
- Subject: [Bug rtl-optimization/64110] [5 Regression] ICE: Max. number of generated reload insns per insn is achieved (90)
- Auto-submitted: auto-generated
- References: <bug-64110-4 at http dot gcc dot gnu dot org/bugzilla/>
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64110
Jakub Jelinek <jakub at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
CC| |law at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #16 from Jakub Jelinek <jakub at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
(In reply to Vladimir Makarov from comment #15)
> Jakub, I've checked this particular test and LRA works in the same way as
> reload and as specified in the GCC documentation which mainly says that '!'
> is ignored only when *all* operands satisfy the alternative constraints. In
> this case there is one reload therefore alternative with '!r' is rejected.
> I understand that for this insn the desirable behaviour is to reject
> alternative only when operand with '!r' needs a reload.
>
> I could implement such functionality. The following unreserved special
> characters can be used as such modifier with the new functionality:
> @ $ ^ -
>
> What character would you prefer, Jakub?
No strong opinion, perhaps @ ? Jeff, what would you prefer?