This is the mail archive of the
gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the GCC project.
[Bug tree-optimization/63986] [5 Regression][SH] gcc.target/sh/pr51244-15.c failures
- From: "olegendo at gcc dot gnu.org" <gcc-bugzilla at gcc dot gnu dot org>
- To: gcc-bugs at gcc dot gnu dot org
- Date: Thu, 20 Nov 2014 18:15:08 +0000
- Subject: [Bug tree-optimization/63986] [5 Regression][SH] gcc.target/sh/pr51244-15.c failures
- Auto-submitted: auto-generated
- References: <bug-63986-4 at http dot gcc dot gnu dot org/bugzilla/>
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63986
--- Comment #7 from Oleg Endo <olegendo at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
(In reply to Richard Biener from comment #1)
> I think you were mostly lucky
And exactly that's why I'd better not rely on combine dreaming up the parallel
pattern if I want to control the instruction (sequence) selection in a more
reliable way.
I didn't mean to file this PR as tree-optimization, but rather as a target
issue.