This is the mail archive of the gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format: [Raw text]

[Bug target/55212] [SH] Switch to LRA


https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55212

--- Comment #74 from Oleg Endo <olegendo at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
(In reply to Kazumoto Kojima from comment #73)
> I'm not sure about ARM.  The problematic cases I've looked at are
> high R0 pressure cases and IRA decided to allocate equiv value
> registers to memory as most profitable ones.
> It looks that the remained code size inflation came from R0-ness,
> very limited base+display addressing, only one index register and
> so on.

OK, makes sense.

> I'll attach the test cases for them to this PR after merge
> from trunk and commit current patches.

Thanks!


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]