This is the mail archive of the
gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the GCC project.
[Bug fortran/60576] [4.8/4.9 Regression] FAIL: gfortran.dg/assumed_rank_7.f90
- From: "jakub at gcc dot gnu.org" <gcc-bugzilla at gcc dot gnu dot org>
- To: gcc-bugs at gcc dot gnu dot org
- Date: Mon, 24 Mar 2014 18:07:50 +0000
- Subject: [Bug fortran/60576] [4.8/4.9 Regression] FAIL: gfortran.dg/assumed_rank_7.f90
- Auto-submitted: auto-generated
- References: <bug-60576-4 at http dot gcc dot gnu dot org/bugzilla/>
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60576
--- Comment #4 from Jakub Jelinek <jakub at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
BTW, I'm also getting:
+FAIL: gfortran.dg/ichar_3.f90 -O (internal compiler error)
+FAIL: gfortran.dg/ichar_3.f90 -O (test for excess errors)
+FAIL: gfortran.dg/intrinsics_kind_argument_1.f90 -O (internal compiler
error)
+FAIL: gfortran.dg/intrinsics_kind_argument_1.f90 -O (test for excess errors)
when f951 is built with -fstack-protector, again, doesn't look like a recent
regression, at some point this ICEd, at other points it needs
-fstack-protector, -D_FORTIFY_SOURCE, valgrind or asan.