This is the mail archive of the
gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the GCC project.
[Bug other/60589] Parallel install fails due to multiple cilk.h installs
- From: "burnus at gcc dot gnu.org" <gcc-bugzilla at gcc dot gnu dot org>
- To: gcc-bugs at gcc dot gnu dot org
- Date: Wed, 19 Mar 2014 22:14:13 +0000
- Subject: [Bug other/60589] Parallel install fails due to multiple cilk.h installs
- Auto-submitted: auto-generated
- References: <bug-60589-4 at http dot gcc dot gnu dot org/bugzilla/>
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60589
Tobias Burnus <burnus at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed| |2014-03-19
Summary|Parallel install fails |Parallel install fails due
| |to multiple cilk.h installs
Ever confirmed|0 |1
--- Comment #2 from Tobias Burnus <burnus at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
(In reply to Yury Gribov from comment #0)
> It looks like libcilkrts Makefile tries to install cilk.h twice in parallel
> (in install-nodist_cilkinclude_HEADERS and install-cilkincludeHEADERS) and
> runs into a conflict.
> The error was probably introduced in r208440.
Hmm, I wonder why I did not see it when I tried it. I once did a find to see
whether "cilk.h" was installed - but the find turned up blank. I now do see
several cilk/ include files - including cilk.h. :-(
Probably the right choice is to simply revert r208440.
> BTW could someone add libcilkrts to list of components?
What do you mean by this? I have a pending - and hopefully more sensible -
patch at http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2014-03/msg00492.html where
-fcilkplus implies -lcilkrts [-pthread], but I am not sure whether that's what
you meant.