This is the mail archive of the gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format: [Raw text]

[Bug c/59825] Many cilkplus test failures


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59825

Hans-Peter Nilsson <hp at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
                 CC|                            |hp at gcc dot gnu.org

--- Comment #4 from Hans-Peter Nilsson <hp at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
(In reply to Jeffrey A. Law from comment #3)
> Given Cilk+ is new in 4.9 the test failures are not a regression.

Meh, I see you subscribe to the release-maintainer-definition; still they
passed before, so it's a regression on trunk, even if not compared to a
release.
(An autotester doesn't care whether the reason they passed is right or wrong,
it just keeps shouting at me...)  Anyway, apparently all targets see this, pain
dutily shared. Thanks to H.J. for the PR.


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]