This is the mail archive of the gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format: [Raw text]

[Bug bootstrap/59496] [4.9 Regression] Bootstrap fails on powerpc-apple-darwin9 after r205685


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59496

Jakub Jelinek <jakub at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
                 CC|                            |jakub at gcc dot gnu.org

--- Comment #4 from Jakub Jelinek <jakub at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
(In reply to Iain Sandoe from comment #3)
> (In reply to Richard Biener from comment #2)
> > darwin should simply add a dummy use of field, like via ((field), (...))
> 
> well, I thought of doing that, but it seems a kludge - is the target obliged
> to use the macro values?

Given that all other targets use it, I'd say yes in this case.


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]