This is the mail archive of the
gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the GCC project.
[Bug libstdc++/58437] [4.7/4.8/4.9 Regression] Sorting value in reverse order is much slower compare to gcc44
- From: "glisse at gcc dot gnu.org" <gcc-bugzilla at gcc dot gnu dot org>
- To: gcc-bugs at gcc dot gnu dot org
- Date: Thu, 19 Sep 2013 11:28:50 +0000
- Subject: [Bug libstdc++/58437] [4.7/4.8/4.9 Regression] Sorting value in reverse order is much slower compare to gcc44
- Auto-submitted: auto-generated
- References: <bug-58437-4 at http dot gcc dot gnu dot org/bugzilla/>
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58437
--- Comment #18 from Marc Glisse <glisse at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
[Ugh, bugzilla seems half broken at the moment]
> I would suggest my current patch (which is simpler than it looks from the diff) for previous versions, then investigate pivot.
Well, you're the one doing all the work ;-)
(svn diff --diff-cmd diff -x -u10 (actually I have diff-cmd = diff-for-svn in
~/.subversion/config where diff-for-svn is a script where I put the options I
like, so svn diff does it by default), too bad -p often doesn't work well with
C++)