This is the mail archive of the
gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the GCC project.
[Bug fortran/58469] [4.8/4.9 Regression] Defined assignment: ICE, possibly wrong value
- From: "burnus at gcc dot gnu.org" <gcc-bugzilla at gcc dot gnu dot org>
- To: gcc-bugs at gcc dot gnu dot org
- Date: Wed, 18 Sep 2013 21:59:29 +0000
- Subject: [Bug fortran/58469] [4.8/4.9 Regression] Defined assignment: ICE, possibly wrong value
- Auto-submitted: auto-generated
- References: <bug-58469-4 at http dot gcc dot gnu dot org/bugzilla/>
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58469
--- Comment #2 from Tobias Burnus <burnus at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
(In reply to Tobias Burnus from comment #0)
> Additionally, I wonder what the code should print - 20 or 42. With the
> current code (plus patch) and with crayftn it prints 20. (ifort and pgf95
> segfault.) I have the vague feeling that 42 is correct
Correction: I meant that gfortran(+comment 0 patch) and crayftn print 42 -
while I (wrongly?) expect that the defined assignment gets invoked, leading to
the value 20.