This is the mail archive of the gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format: [Raw text]

[Bug middle-end/57393] [4.9 Regression] error: definition in block 4 follows the use / internal compiler error: verify_ssa failed


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57393

--- Comment #27 from Easwaran Raman <eraman at google dot com> ---
These two test cases pass for me (compiles with -O3) with the attached patch
(http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=30690). 
gcc --version returns:

gcc (GCC) 4.9.0 20130821 (experimental)

At what revision are you still getting the ICEs? The patch attached to this bug
subsumes the one posted in
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2013-07/msg01584.html .

(In reply to Joost VandeVondele from comment #24)
> Also the other 'dup' PRs still fail (gcc -O3) . Collecting testcases here:
> 
> > cat  PR58018.c
> 
> int a, b, c, d, e;
> 
> void bar (int p)
> {
>   int f = b;
>   e &= p <= (f ^= 0);
> }
> 
> void foo ()
> {
>   for (; d; d++)
>     {
>       bar (a && c);
>       bar (0);
>       bar (1);
>     }
> }
> 
> 
> > cat PR58131.c
> 
> short a;
> int b, c;
> int d[1][4][2];
> 
> void foo ()
> {
>   int *e;
>   for (b = 1;; b--)
>     {
>       if (*e)
> 	break;
>       for (c = 2; c >= 0; c--)
>         {
> 	  *e |= d[0][3][b] != a;
> 	  int *f = &d[0][3][b];
> 	  *f = 0;
>         }
>     }
> }

Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]