This is the mail archive of the gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format: [Raw text]

[Bug gcov-profile/58127] [4.9 Regression] 37 failures in gcc.dg/tree-prof/ for x86_64-apple-darwin10


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58127

--- Comment #6 from Iain Sandoe <iains at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
(In reply to Iain Sandoe from comment #5)
> (In reply to Jan Hubicka from comment #4)
> > The secret plan was to not use TLS for emutls.

that's kind of a pity, since IIRC one of the main reasons for recasting the
emutls implementation as a separate pass was to allow for uses like this; 
but, having said that, probably not a high priority.

> > There seems to be macro USE_EMUTLS specifying if we have real TLS or emuTLS.

<snip>

> ... seems plausible, will try it on my next build cycle.

#if defined(HAVE_CC_TLS) && !defined (USE_EMUTLS)

does, indeed, work.


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]