This is the mail archive of the
gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the GCC project.
[Bug rtl-optimization/57451] Incorrect debug ranges emitted for -freorder-blocks-and-partition -g
- From: "ccoutant at google dot com" <gcc-bugzilla at gcc dot gnu dot org>
- To: gcc-bugs at gcc dot gnu dot org
- Date: Fri, 09 Aug 2013 23:23:43 +0000
- Subject: [Bug rtl-optimization/57451] Incorrect debug ranges emitted for -freorder-blocks-and-partition -g
- Auto-submitted: auto-generated
- References: <bug-57451-4 at http dot gcc dot gnu dot org/bugzilla/>
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57451
--- Comment #7 from ccoutant at google dot com ---
> Index: final.c
> ===================================================================
> --- final.c (revision 201461)
> +++ final.c (working copy)
> @@ -1560,6 +1560,16 @@ change_scope (rtx orig_insn, tree s1, tree s2)
> tree ts1 = s1, ts2 = s2;
> tree s;
>
> + if (NOTE_P (orig_insn) && NOTE_KIND (orig_insn) ==
> NOTE_INSN_SWITCH_TEXT_SECTIONS)
> + {
> + gcc_assert (s1 == s1);
That should be s1 == s2, right?
> + rtx note = emit_note_before (NOTE_INSN_BLOCK_END, orig_insn);
> + NOTE_BLOCK (note) = s1;
> + note = emit_note_before (NOTE_INSN_BLOCK_BEG, next_insn (orig_insn));
> + NOTE_BLOCK (note) = s1;
> + return;
> + }
> +
> while (ts1 != ts2)
> {
> gcc_assert (ts1 && ts2);
> @@ -1604,12 +1614,16 @@ reemit_insn_block_notes (void)
> rtx insn, note;
>
> insn = get_insns ();
> - if (!active_insn_p (insn))
> - insn = next_active_insn (insn);
> - for (; insn; insn = next_active_insn (insn))
> + for (; insn; insn = next_insn (insn))
> {
> tree this_block;
>
> + if (NOTE_P (insn) && NOTE_KIND (insn) == NOTE_INSN_SWITCH_TEXT_SECTIONS)
> + change_scope (insn, cur_block, cur_block);
It seems to me like you should just emit the three notes directly
here. This is really using change_scope for a new purpose, as you're
not really changing scopes, just putting a break into one.
> + if (!active_insn_p (insn))
> + continue;
I'm not clear on why this is needed. Is it because after the
change_scope, insn will now be a NOTE? If that's it, just put the
continue in the previous if clause.
-cary