This is the mail archive of the gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format: [Raw text]

[Bug translation/58087] New: Huge memory consumption with #pragma GCC optimize, __attribute__ and long output paths


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58087

            Bug ID: 58087
           Summary: Huge memory consumption with #pragma GCC optimize,
                    __attribute__ and long output paths
           Product: gcc
           Version: 4.8.1
            Status: UNCONFIRMED
          Severity: normal
          Priority: P3
         Component: translation
          Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
          Reporter: manisandro at gmail dot com

Using gcc version 4.8.1 20130717 (Red Hat 4.8.1-5) (GCC)

Description:
Any code containing #pragma GCC optimize, lots of __attribute__(()) will result
in cc1 taking up huge amounts of memory _depending_ on the length of the output
path.

Test case:
$ for i in $(seq 1 10000); do echo -e "void __attribute__(()) fz$i();" >>
test.h; done

$ cat > test.c <<EOF
#pragma GCC optimize ("-O1")
#include "test.h"
int main(){ return 0; }
EOF

$ wget
https://gist.github.com/netj/526585/raw/9044a9972fd71d215ba034a38174960c1c9079ad/memusg
$ chmod +x memusg

$ mkdir a
$ ./memusg gcc -c -o a/test.o test.c
memusg: peak=485796

$ mkdir aaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa
$ ./memusg gcc -c -o aaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa/test.o test.c
memusg: peak=4827100

Observations:
- The "-O1" is not important, passing any other string to #pragma GCC optimize
(regardless of whether it is valid or invalid) will also trigger the issue
- As noted, the memory consumption depends on the length of the output path


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]