This is the mail archive of the gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format: [Raw text]

[Bug middle-end/57974] std::pow(std::complex<long double>(0),1) returns (-nan,-nan)


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57974

Marc Glisse <glisse at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
                 CC|glisse at gcc dot gnu.org          |

--- Comment #20 from Marc Glisse <glisse at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
For reference, on my system, the performance ratio between a call to the libc
expl and the inlined unsafe code is roughly 1.6.


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]