This is the mail archive of the
gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the GCC project.
[Bug sanitizer/55309] gcc's address-sanitizer 66% slower than clang's
- From: "kcc at gcc dot gnu.org" <gcc-bugzilla at gcc dot gnu dot org>
- To: gcc-bugs at gcc dot gnu dot org
- Date: Fri, 22 Feb 2013 07:11:06 +0000
- Subject: [Bug sanitizer/55309] gcc's address-sanitizer 66% slower than clang's
- Auto-submitted: auto-generated
- References: <bug-55309-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55309
--- Comment #43 from Kostya Serebryany <kcc at gcc dot gnu.org> 2013-02-22 07:11:06 UTC ---
gcc r196201: -O2 -fno-aggressive-loop-optimizations
clang 175735: -O2
x86_64 linux, both are using the new 7fff8000 shadow offset
400.perlbench, 1136.00, -1.00, -0.00
401.bzip2, 838.00, 1154.00, 1.38
403.gcc, 716.00, 742.00, 1.04
429.mcf, 582.00, 578.00, 0.99
445.gobmk, 801.00, 1138.00, 1.42
456.hmmer, 1277.00, 1515.00, 1.19
458.sjeng, 869.00, 1258.00, 1.45
462.libquantum, 532.00, 469.00, 0.88
464.h264ref, 1303.00, 4395.00, 3.37
471.omnetpp, 568.00, 585.00, 1.03
473.astar, 647.00, 748.00, 1.16
483.xalancbmk, 460.00, 534.00, 1.16
433.milc, 659.00, 614.00, 0.93
444.namd, 592.00, 531.00, 0.90
447.dealII, 614.00, 706.00, 1.15
450.soplex, 367.00, 406.00, 1.11
453.povray, 423.00, 410.00, 0.97
470.lbm, 377.00, 401.00, 1.06
482.sphinx3, 958.00, 1325.00, 1.38
400.perlbench fails with a global-buffer-overflow which clang does not detect.
I did not investigate why. It could be a gcc false positive or clang false
negative.
464.h264ref is VERY slow, I did not look why.