This is the mail archive of the
gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the GCC project.
[Bug lto/56061] [4.8 Regression] ICE in lto1 (in inline_call, at ipa-inline-transform.c:267)
- From: "rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org" <gcc-bugzilla at gcc dot gnu dot org>
- To: gcc-bugs at gcc dot gnu dot org
- Date: Wed, 30 Jan 2013 11:21:11 +0000
- Subject: [Bug lto/56061] [4.8 Regression] ICE in lto1 (in inline_call, at ipa-inline-transform.c:267)
- Auto-submitted: auto-generated
- References: <bug-56061-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56061
--- Comment #4 from Richard Biener <rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org> 2013-01-30 11:21:11 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #2)
> (In reply to comment #1)
>
> > I don't think we necessarily want to support this fully...
>
> Are such bug reports useful, or it's just a nuisance to you, gcc devs? :)
They are useful. It should be technically possible to support -O1 vs. -O0,
and if not, we have means to forcefully enable -O1 at link-time (which we
should do then).