This is the mail archive of the
gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the GCC project.
[Bug debug/55059] [4.8 Regression] DWARF missing concrete class definition
- From: "jason at gcc dot gnu.org" <gcc-bugzilla at gcc dot gnu dot org>
- To: gcc-bugs at gcc dot gnu dot org
- Date: Mon, 28 Jan 2013 01:54:25 +0000
- Subject: [Bug debug/55059] [4.8 Regression] DWARF missing concrete class definition
- Auto-submitted: auto-generated
- References: <bug-55059-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55059
--- Comment #4 from Jason Merrill <jason at gcc dot gnu.org> 2013-01-28 01:54:25 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #3)
> If we change gdb to cope with this, I think the effect will be to undo what
> the patches here were attempting to accomplish.
I believe the patch was trying to avoid treating a partial definition as a full
definition when there's a full definition of the class in another CU. If
there's only the partial definition, the best we can do is to use that. That
seems better to me than the situation we had before.