This is the mail archive of the
gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the GCC project.
[Bug fortran/55072] [4.6/4.7/4.8 Regression] Missing internal_pack leads to wrong code with derived type
- From: "janus at gcc dot gnu.org" <gcc-bugzilla at gcc dot gnu dot org>
- To: gcc-bugs at gcc dot gnu dot org
- Date: Sat, 15 Dec 2012 16:05:36 +0000
- Subject: [Bug fortran/55072] [4.6/4.7/4.8 Regression] Missing internal_pack leads to wrong code with derived type
- Auto-submitted: auto-generated
- References: <bug-55072-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55072
--- Comment #12 from janus at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-12-15 16:05:36 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #11)
> Note: This still shows scan-tree-dump failures on assumed_type_2.f90, but now
> only 2 of them at -O0 (instead of 4):
>
> FAIL: gfortran.dg/assumed_type_2.f90 -O0 scan-tree-dump-times original
> "sub_array_assumed \\(D" 2
> FAIL: gfortran.dg/assumed_type_2.f90 -O0 scan-tree-dump-times original
> "sub_array_assumed \\(\\(struct t3.0:. .\\) array_t3_ptr.data\\);" 1
>
> Will do another full regtest ...
Ok, I have verified that those two are indeed the only testsuite failures of
the patch in comment #11.