This is the mail archive of the
gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the GCC project.
[Bug ada/55243] STAMP variable is not defined in t-avr
- From: "ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu.org" <gcc-bugzilla at gcc dot gnu dot org>
- To: gcc-bugs at gcc dot gnu dot org
- Date: Wed, 12 Dec 2012 11:35:07 +0000
- Subject: [Bug ada/55243] STAMP variable is not defined in t-avr
- Auto-submitted: auto-generated
- References: <bug-55243-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55243
--- Comment #24 from Eric Botcazou <ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu.org> 2012-12-12 11:35:07 UTC ---
> What I don't understand is what is bad with Rolf's proposal of defining STAMP?
We simply don't need to stamp anything for the gnattools.
> Stamping is not that unusual in the build process. Up to now it was not
> needed, but is it that critical to set STAMP like proposed above?
Well, building the gnattools works flawlessly for all targets except for AVR,
because of a very questionable kludge. So it makes sense to fix the kludge.