This is the mail archive of the
gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the GCC project.
[Bug middle-end/51233] [ipa-iterations] running multiple passes of early IPA on zlib produces more optimal code
- From: "richard.guenther at gmail dot com" <gcc-bugzilla at gcc dot gnu dot org>
- To: gcc-bugs at gcc dot gnu dot org
- Date: Wed, 05 Dec 2012 09:23:56 +0000
- Subject: [Bug middle-end/51233] [ipa-iterations] running multiple passes of early IPA on zlib produces more optimal code
- Auto-submitted: auto-generated
- References: <bug-51233-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51233
--- Comment #6 from richard.guenther at gmail dot com <richard.guenther at gmail dot com> 2012-12-05 09:23:56 UTC ---
On Tue, Dec 4, 2012 at 9:35 PM, matt at use dot net
<gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org> wrote:
>
> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51233
>
> --- Comment #5 from Matt Hargett <matt at use dot net> 2012-12-04 20:35:09 UTC ---
> ping? if you're more comfortable with relegating multiple passes to LTO, I
> think that's a good starting point. we can wait for a per-unit C++ template
> case to come up after that's in.
Yes, multiple LTO passes is what I think should be done (or alternatively
if one really dislikes this better processing of cgraph SCCs during early
optimizations like I outlined in some e-mail response to the original
patches). But the LTO approach should be more powerful anyway.
> is there anything you'd like me to do to get this moving again?
Produce patches for review?
;)