This is the mail archive of the
gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the GCC project.
[Bug testsuite/55452] New: [4.8 Regression]: gfortran.dg/reassoc_4.f -O scan-tree-dump-times reassoc1
- From: "hp at gcc dot gnu.org" <gcc-bugzilla at gcc dot gnu dot org>
- To: gcc-bugs at gcc dot gnu dot org
- Date: Fri, 23 Nov 2012 18:41:29 +0000
- Subject: [Bug testsuite/55452] New: [4.8 Regression]: gfortran.dg/reassoc_4.f -O scan-tree-dump-times reassoc1
- Auto-submitted: auto-generated
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55452
Bug #: 55452
Summary: [4.8 Regression]: gfortran.dg/reassoc_4.f -O
scan-tree-dump-times reassoc1
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.8.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: testsuite
AssignedTo: unassigned@gcc.gnu.org
ReportedBy: hp@gcc.gnu.org
CC: hubicka@gcc.gnu.org
Host: x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu
Target: cris-axis-elf
This test previously passed, now it fails.
A patch in the revision range (last_known_working:first_known_failing)
193563:193575 exposed or caused this regression. Since then it fails as
follows:
Running /tmp/hpautotest-gcc1/gcc/gcc/testsuite/gfortran.dg/dg.exp ...
...
FAIL: gfortran.dg/reassoc_4.f -O scan-tree-dump-times reassoc1 "[0-9] \\* "
22
The message in gfortran.log is:
Executing on host:
/tmp/hpautotest-gcc1/cris-elf/gccobj/gcc/testsuite/gfortran/../../gfortran
-B/tmp/hpautotest-gcc1/cris-elf/gccobj/gcc/testsuite/gfortran/../../
-B/tmp/hpautotest-gcc1/cris-elf/gccobj/cris-elf/./libgfortran/
/tmp/hpautotest-gcc1/gcc/gcc/testsuite/gfortran.dg/reassoc_4.f
-fno-diagnostics-show-caret -O -O3 -ffast-math -fdump-tree-reassoc1 -S
-isystem /tmp/hpautotest-gcc1/cris-elf/gccobj/cris-elf/./newlib/targ-include
-isystem /tmp/hpautotest-gcc1/gcc/newlib/libc/include -o reassoc_4.s
(timeout = 300)
PASS: gfortran.dg/reassoc_4.f -O (test for excess errors)
FAIL: gfortran.dg/reassoc_4.f -O scan-tree-dump-times reassoc1 "[0-9] \\* "
22
>From looking at gcc-testresults archives, the regression is universal.
Author of most suspect patch (r193570) in revision range CC:ed.
It looks like just a testsuite adjustment missing.