This is the mail archive of the
gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the GCC project.
[Bug bootstrap/55051] [4.8 Regression] profiledbootstrap failed
- From: "tejohnson at google dot com" <gcc-bugzilla at gcc dot gnu dot org>
- To: gcc-bugs at gcc dot gnu dot org
- Date: Thu, 15 Nov 2012 02:46:20 +0000
- Subject: [Bug bootstrap/55051] [4.8 Regression] profiledbootstrap failed
- Auto-submitted: auto-generated
- References: <bug-55051-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55051
--- Comment #22 from Teresa Johnson <tejohnson at google dot com> 2012-11-15 02:46:20 UTC ---
Ok, will see if I can submit that one tomorrow then, after double
checking the performance.
Teresa
On Wed, Nov 14, 2012 at 6:01 PM, hubicka at ucw dot cz
<gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org> wrote:
>
> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55051
>
> --- Comment #21 from Jan Hubicka <hubicka at ucw dot cz> 2012-11-15 02:01:01 UTC ---
>> Ok, I can do that. I had tried that but didn't see any gain yet (need
>> to take a look at my results again). I have been playing with teasing
>> apart the various uses of this cutoff (inlining vs instruction
>> selection vs etc) too, but can do that in a later release once the
>> appropriate individual cutoffs are tuned. I also have a loop unroller
>> patch on the google branch that uses this that needs to be ported to
>> trunk. It was in the original working set patch I sent for review,
>> that ended up being split out and revised heavily. Shall I resubmit
>> this part for 4.8 or is it too late?
>
> I can't review the unroller change, so you should ask one of the maintainers
> of the area. For the hot/cold change, I would really like to see it in.
> (and yes, I also plan to use it for more aggressive inlining in known to
> be hot areas).
>
> Honza
>
> --
> Configure bugmail: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
> ------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
> You are on the CC list for the bug.