This is the mail archive of the gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format: [Raw text]

[Bug bootstrap/55051] [4.8 Regression] profiledbootstrap failed


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55051

--- Comment #22 from Teresa Johnson <tejohnson at google dot com> 2012-11-15 02:46:20 UTC ---
Ok, will see if I can submit that one tomorrow then, after double
checking the performance.

Teresa

On Wed, Nov 14, 2012 at 6:01 PM, hubicka at ucw dot cz
<gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org> wrote:
>
> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55051
>
> --- Comment #21 from Jan Hubicka <hubicka at ucw dot cz> 2012-11-15 02:01:01 UTC ---
>> Ok, I can do that. I had tried that but didn't see any gain yet (need
>> to take a look at my results again). I have been playing with teasing
>> apart the various uses of this cutoff (inlining vs instruction
>> selection vs etc) too, but can do that in a later release once the
>> appropriate individual cutoffs are tuned. I also have a loop unroller
>> patch on the google branch that uses this that needs to be ported to
>> trunk. It was in the original working set patch I sent for review,
>> that ended up being split out and revised heavily. Shall I resubmit
>> this part for 4.8 or is it too late?
>
> I can't review the unroller change, so you should ask one of the maintainers
> of the area.  For the hot/cold change, I would really like to see it in.
> (and yes, I also plan to use it for more aggressive inlining in known to
> be hot areas).
>
> Honza
>
> --
> Configure bugmail: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
> ------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
> You are on the CC list for the bug.


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]