This is the mail archive of the gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format: [Raw text]

[Bug fortran/54880] [OOP] ICE in gfc_create_module_variable, at fortran/trans-decl.c:4013


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54880

--- Comment #2 from Sylwester Arabas <slayoo at staszic dot waw.pl> 2012-10-12 09:48:12 UTC ---
Hi,

I've came across it after simply switching the order of module definitions in a
file (i.e. no preprocessor - I've used the preprocessor to simplify the test
case). 

I would then answer: definitely YES! - fixing it might save someone a lot of
time. Due to the ICE, and due the fact that the presence of the .mod file
influences gfortran's behaviour here, figuring out what's wrong is really
tricky and time consuming. 

Sylwester


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]