This is the mail archive of the
gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the GCC project.
[Bug target/54699] [4.8 Regression] [SH] gfortran.dg/class_array_9.f03 ICEs
- From: "olegendo at gcc dot gnu.org" <gcc-bugzilla at gcc dot gnu dot org>
- To: gcc-bugs at gcc dot gnu dot org
- Date: Wed, 10 Oct 2012 00:22:54 +0000
- Subject: [Bug target/54699] [4.8 Regression] [SH] gfortran.dg/class_array_9.f03 ICEs
- Auto-submitted: auto-generated
- References: <bug-54699-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54699
--- Comment #6 from Oleg Endo <olegendo at gcc dot gnu.org> 2012-10-10 00:22:54 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #5)
>
> It looks we've got reg+reg+const addressing. It seems that
> reload_completed simply means that hard register are allocated
> already but doesn't mean transformations of addressing are done.
> Splitting movsf_ie would be the way to go, I guess.
Thanks for trying it out. Good to know.
It's just that the comment above movsf_ie...
;; We may not split the ry/yr/XX alternatives to movsi_ie, since
;; update_flow_info would not know where to put REG_EQUAL notes
;; when the destination changes mode.
sounds a bit scary. However...
grep update_flow_info gcc/*
gcc/ChangeLog-1999: (update_flow_info): Move to flow.c, renamed to
update_life_info;
That was quite a while ago... maybe it isn't a problem anymore.