This is the mail archive of the gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format: [Raw text]

[Bug c++/54180] a bug using strcat function - it depends on variable declare order, but it should not.


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54180

Jonathan Wakely <redi at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
             Status|UNCONFIRMED                 |RESOLVED
         Resolution|                            |INVALID

--- Comment #10 from Jonathan Wakely <redi at gcc dot gnu.org> 2012-08-10 14:51:15 UTC ---
Your bug report is useless, you have not provided the information requested at
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugs/ so it cannot be compiled or verified, and your
description of the problem is hard to follow.

The problem is that your array is too small for the data you write to the
array. This has nothing to do with the order of declarations.

You declare SQL1[150] then you call

strcat(SQL1,"select id,' ', to_char(dt_date,'DD.MM.YYYY'),' ',int_from,'
','>',' ',int_to,' ',cur_amount,' ',(select str_comment from
tbl_dic_payment_types where tbl_dic_payment_types.id=tbl_bills.int_type) as
type,' ', (select case when int_type=1 then 'business' else 'personal' end from
tbl_bills_entity_type where tbl_bills_entity_type.int_bill=tbl_bills.id) as
test2 from tbl_bills ");

That's more than 150 characters. Your program has a bug, not GCC.


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]