This is the mail archive of the gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format: [Raw text]

[Bug fortran/54107] [4.8 Regression] Memory hog with abstract interface


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54107

--- Comment #5 from janus at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-07-29 20:54:21 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #4)
> I would assume that this is invalid, since the declaration of compute_routine's
> interface is somehow 'recursive', i.e. referring to itself.

... however, I could not find anything in the standard that would prohibit it.
And also Bob Corbett claims that it is valid in the c.l.f. thread mentioned in
comment #0.

The problem is that we generate an infinite chain of symbols: 'compute_routine'
has a formal argument 'zfunc', which itself has an argument 'zfunc', and so on.

Certainly, gfc_copy_formal_args plays a role in this process, but also
resolve_formal_arglist is involved.


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]