This is the mail archive of the
gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the GCC project.
[Bug c/53656] New: sequence point bug
- From: "alexcheremkhin at gmail dot com" <gcc-bugzilla at gcc dot gnu dot org>
- To: gcc-bugs at gcc dot gnu dot org
- Date: Wed, 13 Jun 2012 12:09:04 +0000
- Subject: [Bug c/53656] New: sequence point bug
- Auto-submitted: auto-generated
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53656
Bug #: 53656
Summary: sequence point bug
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: unknown
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: c
AssignedTo: unassigned@gcc.gnu.org
ReportedBy: alexcheremkhin@gmail.com
Created attachment 27614
--> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=27614
source code
$gcc -v
COLLECT_GCC=gcc
COLLECT_LTO_WRAPPER=/usr/local/libexec/gcc/i686-pc-linux-gnu/4.6.0/lto-wrapper
ÐÐÐÐÐÐÑ ÐÑÑÐÑÐÐÑÑÑÐ: i686-pc-linux-gnu
ÐÐÑÐÐÐÑÑÑ ÐÐÐÑÐÐÑÑÐÑÐÐ: ./configure
ÐÐÐÐÐÑ ÐÐÐÐÐÐÐÑÐÑÐÐÑÑÐ: posix
gcc ÐÐÑÑÐÑ 4.6.0 (GCC)
Optimization options do not matter (result is the same).
Source code:
----------------------------------------------------
/* bug.c */
#include <stdio.h>
int x = 0;
int f()
{
return x++;
}
int main()
{
int y = x++ + f();
printf("x=%d\n", x);
return 0;
}
------------------------------------------------------
The program should have printed 'x=2', but prints 'x=1'.
It looks like the variable x had been read to a register before call of f(),
and incremented after the call.
The function call makes a sequence point, so the behaviuor is not correct.
Alexey Cheremkhin; Compiler Department, KM211.
avc@km211.ru