This is the mail archive of the
gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the GCC project.
[Bug fortran/53521] [4.5/4.6/4.7/4.8 Regression] Memory leak with zero-sized array constructor
- From: "burnus at gcc dot gnu.org" <gcc-bugzilla at gcc dot gnu dot org>
- To: gcc-bugs at gcc dot gnu dot org
- Date: Fri, 01 Jun 2012 21:07:49 +0000
- Subject: [Bug fortran/53521] [4.5/4.6/4.7/4.8 Regression] Memory leak with zero-sized array constructor
- Auto-submitted: auto-generated
- References: <bug-53521-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53521
Tobias Burnus <burnus at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Status|ASSIGNED |RESOLVED
Resolution| |FIXED
Target Milestone|4.6.4 |4.5.4
Summary|[4.5/4.6/4.7 Regression] |[4.5/4.6/4.7/4.8
|Memory leak with zero-sized |Regression] Memory leak
|array constructor |with zero-sized array
| |constructor
Known to fail| |4.8.0
--- Comment #14 from Tobias Burnus <burnus at gcc dot gnu.org> 2012-06-01 21:07:49 UTC ---
FIXED on the trunk and on all still maintained branches: 4.5, 4.6 and 4.7.
(In reply to comment #10)
> this fixes the issue I saw for CP2K. From some further tests I
> did, I couldn't see any negative side effects.
Good to hear.
> I had a look at other gcc branches, the patch applies flawlessly to 4.7 and 4.6
> (I did not have a 4.5 branch around).
The patch didn't apply directly to 4.5, but replicating the code manually was
very simple.
> I would be very happy to see it integrated in 4.7.1 and 4.6.4,
Note that 4.7.1 will be released soon; I think release-candidate build is due
next week.