This is the mail archive of the
gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the GCC project.
[Bug c++/53524] [4.7/4.8 Regression] Bogus and unsuppressible enum comparison warning
- From: "paolo.carlini at oracle dot com" <gcc-bugzilla at gcc dot gnu dot org>
- To: gcc-bugs at gcc dot gnu dot org
- Date: Thu, 31 May 2012 17:48:06 +0000
- Subject: [Bug c++/53524] [4.7/4.8 Regression] Bogus and unsuppressible enum comparison warning
- Auto-submitted: auto-generated
- References: <bug-53524-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53524
--- Comment #16 from Paolo Carlini <paolo.carlini at oracle dot com> 2012-05-31 17:48:06 UTC ---
In any case I recommend not mixing together here different issues: the first
one, subject of this report, is overeager warning in open enum context with
conditional operators (I understand that by now we agree that the warning is
behaving as designed, only it seems sensible to have a way to at least
controlling it, cmp C front end, EDG); the second one is about speculative
defects in the way the C++ front end handles enumerated types. For the latter
we need testcases in Bugzilla, actually a separate PR should be opened.