This is the mail archive of the
gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the GCC project.
[Bug middle-end/53088] [4.8 Regression] gcc.target/i386/pr39082-1.c
- From: "hubicka at gcc dot gnu.org" <gcc-bugzilla at gcc dot gnu dot org>
- To: gcc-bugs at gcc dot gnu dot org
- Date: Wed, 25 Apr 2012 11:21:52 +0000
- Subject: [Bug middle-end/53088] [4.8 Regression] gcc.target/i386/pr39082-1.c
- Auto-submitted: auto-generated
- References: <bug-53088-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53088
--- Comment #5 from Jan Hubicka <hubicka at gcc dot gnu.org> 2012-04-25 11:21:52 UTC ---
Hmm, after some playing with this, I don't really know how to make the warning
output right all the time. To fix the regression I will simply update the
testcase.
The warning now goes on different place because of different gimplification
order. We used to first gimplify the call. Now we first gimplify the function
and warn on its declaration.
It is not bad and the input_location is correctly initialized by cgraph.
I do not get any confused carret:
a.c: In function 'foo1':
a.c:16:1: note: the ABI of passing union with long double has changed in GCC
4.4
foo1 (union un u)
^