This is the mail archive of the
gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the GCC project.
[Bug c++/53000] Conditional operator does not behave as standardized
- From: "marc.glisse at normalesup dot org" <gcc-bugzilla at gcc dot gnu dot org>
- To: gcc-bugs at gcc dot gnu dot org
- Date: Tue, 24 Apr 2012 22:35:31 +0000
- Subject: [Bug c++/53000] Conditional operator does not behave as standardized
- Auto-submitted: auto-generated
- References: <bug-53000-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53000
--- Comment #5 from Marc Glisse <marc.glisse at normalesup dot org> 2012-04-24 22:35:31 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #4)
> it's not obvious to me what the right fix is
> either so I'm not in a rush to change anything.
Actually, I now believe it is a good idea to rush (well, maybe not quite) the
change:
- it is needed by clang,
- it gives users an opportunity to complain against the proposed resolution (if
they don't, it is an argument in favor of it),
- it removes an excuse not to fix ?: with xvalues.
I think I've canceled my comment #3 enough that we are back to your comment #2
where you were proposing to make the change ;-)