This is the mail archive of the gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format: [Raw text]

[Bug c++/19377] Using declaration in "private" part causes "protected" diagnostic


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=19377

Manuel LÃpez-IbÃÃez <manu at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
                 CC|                            |manu at gcc dot gnu.org

--- Comment #5 from Manuel LÃpez-IbÃÃez <manu at gcc dot gnu.org> 2012-04-15 17:09:04 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #4)
> 
> The problem seems to be that we do not have the information that 'i' is
> referenced through 'this' when checking the access in accessible_p, unless I'm
> missing something.
> 
> Any idea where to find this information ?

You should write to Jason directly, as he is probably the only person in the
world that understands the C++ FE well enough to answer this.

(And am I the only one who thinks this is REALLY bad for the future of g++?)


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]