This is the mail archive of the
gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the GCC project.
[Bug c++/52957] Missing suggestions on '=' and '==' confusion
- From: "redi at gcc dot gnu.org" <gcc-bugzilla at gcc dot gnu dot org>
- To: gcc-bugs at gcc dot gnu dot org
- Date: Sat, 14 Apr 2012 12:24:47 +0000
- Subject: [Bug c++/52957] Missing suggestions on '=' and '==' confusion
- Auto-submitted: auto-generated
- References: <bug-52957-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52957
--- Comment #8 from Jonathan Wakely <redi at gcc dot gnu.org> 2012-04-14 12:24:47 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #7)
> It is not *technically* hard. Anyone that knows C and a bit of C++ can fix
> hundreds (if you know C++ well and have a some experience with the C++ parser,
There's the problem. I know C++ very well but don't know the front end well
enough to work on it, and don't have time to learn it. My main problem is that
everything is a void* so I have no idea what I can do with a given tree or what
type it is, so I just try something, it compiles (because there's no type
checking) so I run it then debug an ICE and continue by trial and error.
That's not productive. The bottleneck is not the bureaucracy for me.
> Indeed, but my point is that moving to C++ does little (in my opinion) to fix
> the infrastructure issues in GCC: dejagnu is awful, the wiki is unmaintained,
Why should the wiki be maintained? If people want to add to it they can, why
should there be a maintainer?